Filed under: Current Events, Election 2008, Paul, Videos | Tags: Democratic Primary, Souja Boy, The Real World, white people
As a critic of most things, I find myself shaking my head a whole lot. Thusly, I would like to introduce my first installment of the Shaking My Head Awards more commonly known as the SMH’s (get it lol, lmao, gtg…smh?). This post is actually inspired by Melissa Harris-Lacewell’s “John Brown Awards”, which coincidentally put her on the list…well done. These individuals and entities have been awarded an SMH not because I hate them or dislike them, but simply because they have recently made me shake my head in disappointment and/or utter disbelief. Sometimes I laugh afterwards and sometimes I die a little bit afterwards. Either way I applaud you all for the incomprehensible moments of absolute bewilderment that you all have provided me; leaving me to just…shake my head.
Melissa Harris-Lacewell
As noted your “John Brown Awards” are given to “white me who are down for the cause.” So far, so good. After all there’s nothing wrong with giving out awards to deserving individuals. However, giving John Edwards a “John Brown award” is like giving Ward Connerly, the “Nat Turner Award” around his work for racial uplift and commitment to the Left. Now I do appreciate the fact that you started the piece noting that it was “unauthorized” and “likely to be rejected and denounced” which takes away any anger I would have held. That does not however negate the fact that you did this…I suppose that I am no better than you either considering I am responding, albeit facetiously. But I still have to shake my head on this one Professor.
Sidenote: You also told Adolph Reed to get some “hope” because he may “Sitting this one out” based on the fact that he has not found a candidate worth his vote. Listen, some people like to vote for concrete political changes and others like to vote for abstract “change.” I believe we know where both you and Professor Reed stand on this one. That, within itself gets you an honorable mention, at the very least. This also leads to the fact that you seem to be under the impression that an Obama Presidency means we (the homogeneous black community) all got into the White House. Also I’m pretty sure you may be a bit confused or at least a little high off of that Obama smoke considering you keep making all of these references to Obama as if he has already won the election…Thanks Marc Lamont Hill for being the voice of reason (not sipping the kool-aid). Despite all of this I still find you quite attractive ever since you came into my Dyson “class” during my freshman year…not trying to be sexist…but I just thought you should know. I would also appreciate it if you would just brush me off as a silly “hater” with a crush and not ether me on your widely read blog….Thanks a bunch.
Soulja Boy
It should be noted that I am not one of those Soulja Boy haters who act as is if he is the sole proponent of “bad” music. He is just a kid who is simply having fun making songs about Superman and other childish things. No, I do not blame the seventeen year old rap Superstar…But I do blame the idiots who buy his music (not sorry if that includes you). However that is not the reason he made the list. All I can say is “YAHHH!!!!!”
Quite possibly the dumbest video of all time. There are so many issues here it could stand alone as it’s own post…and he has the audacity to tell a kid to stay in school…smh. Furthermore me and my roommate Zay def had the “Throw Some D’s/Report Card” idea way back during our freshman year after a fantastic first semester. So he’s a biter as well…that’s messed up homie. Well at least there is one kid in the world that doesn’t like Soulja Boy.
The Democratic Primary
As I am sure you all know the Democratic Primary is over…wait what?…she quit, but didn’t?….ok it’s now official? Ok well apparently HRC has, quit without conceding, but then actually quit and will know support Obama. Riiiiiight. I mean I don’t like either of you…or the party but do you guys like shooting yourselves in the foot? McCain has this thing locked up considering he doesn’t have to campaign if his enemy implodes. But, hey would the Centrist Party be any better than the Republicans…not really. Because of this dreadfully slow process I have had to endure endless streams of media sound bytes of Rev. Wright, that random white priest and Hillary’s laugh…each of which played on some forms of racism, sexism and prejudice that has been simply annoying and inappropriate. You all are also creating a really big issue by inciting supporters that I’m going to be punching directly in the gut come September on campus.

She actually does look a bit like the Geico Lizard…I suppose that’s what happens when you lose your mind and decide not to concede things that you have admittedly already lost…clown.
This leads me to my next issue…
Obama/HRC Supporters
Listen voting is cool…I guess. If you want people to vote that’s fine, but don’t push you’re politics on me in the process. I mean when I tell you that I am a Republican (this is for you silly Obama supporter outside of my beloved Qdoba) don’t ask me if I want to change my party affiliation. Don’t be “that” guy. I mean the fact that I even feel the need to tell these people that I am a Republican (registered Democrat by default of my laziness to switch to Independent) shows the insanity of the Democratic supporters who will most likely hibernate in their apolitical caves for the next four years. You supporters are crazy. Plain and simple.
I didn’t realize that white people were facing so much bigotry and hatred…sorry to hear that guys…smh.
This again does not go to all supporters. Just the one’s that claim to like these candidate’s politics when they have absolutely no real facts to back that up. I am also talking about those who do know their politics (I’m talking to you Michael “Progressive” Moore) and still back them despite the fact that they are about as left as the number “5” on a scale of 1-10. For the most part this solely applies to Obama supporters as those are mostly where all the young people have aligned. Listen, just come out and say you’re voting for him because he’s black…or because he brushed his shoulders off…or you just like the hype and euphoria. Hey opiates (or abstract campaigns in this case) are cool, man…I dig that. It’s like people favoring Slick Willy Clinton because he was a “pimp”. That’s fine (sort of) but don’t tell me he was the first “black” president when he wasn’t any better than “Hollywood” Reagan. As for Obama, don’t tell me you like his anti-war politics…because they’re not anti-war politics. Instead, tell me that “Hope” and “Change” make you happy. While you will still be a silly character, your silliness will be grounded in fact as opposed to some made up political posturing done by any of these politicians.
Alice Walker

Sister Alice with her “comrade”, Rebecca…I guess that Alice felt that ironing her shirt was sexist as well.
Ah yes the wonderful black writer and feminist, Alice Walker. Let me tell you something Sister Walker, disregarding your child is not ballin’. Treating your daughter like your “sister in the struggle” instead of…oh I don’t know…YOUR DAUGHTER is not cool. I don’t care how “progressive” you think you are; being an terrible mother is not what’s hot in the streets. If you have no clue what I’m talking about peep this article with Rebecca Walker, daughter of Sister Walker. Now I don’t claim to know much about feminist thought, but I pray it does not fall into the “motherhood is servitude” rhetoric of Walker. Now, I’m a considerably reasonable hater so let’s suppose that Ms. Walker is right. Bearing children is problematic. By that rationale, sustainability of life on this planet is inherently sexist. You Ms. Walker get two head shakes…and a sigh.
White people that call me Obama
Due to some of my more bourgeoisie tastes (golfing, symphony, hockey…next year Pens!) as well as my white-collar job, I have been enamored with white people on a level only comparable to my private school experience. Back then I brushed off the endless comparisons to other black people (The Real World’s Teck, Kobe Bryant, Tiger Woods, any white-friendly black person). However, being around more black people at college has led me astray from the silliness of reckless white people. So being back in the world of white privilege has allowed me to experience being called Obama by every white man, woman, boy and girl.

Bush petting an “educated” black man…adds to his collection of safe black people.
The story is always the same:
1. White individual asks if I am in school (gotta ask the black man).
2. Then they ask where. I reply “Penn”, which leads to the “Which branch?” “No Not Penn State”…”Oh main campus”….”No University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia”.
3. Then there is the moment of revelation as they realize that, I a black male attends an ivy-league institution.
4. And like a child on Christmas morning, the white individual’s face glows with benevolent glee at the assimilated negro.
5. “What are you studying young man”…“Political Science and then hopefully law school.”
6. With a small chuckle they reply every time, “Oh you’re going to be the next Obama…Yessir. Has anyone ever told you that you look just like him”.
Just so everyone knows, outside of Eric, I hate all white people. Disregard all of the white women on my Facebook wall and my text message log and my ummm…myspace….but yeah I hate them all.
Spoken Word Artists
Spoken Word has had me shaking my head so much this year my neck is sore. In my time engaging with spoken word much of it is just silly and contrived, as if a poems about black people are going to start the revolution. I’m pretty confident that Che Guevara and his work in blood did a bit more than the entire “revolutionary” activity of every poet to ever do “Def Poetry” since 2002. Spoken Word has blown up quite a bit recently, which has led to it becoming pretty damn cliché, kind of like hip-hop. This makes sense considering it is a lot easier to spit revolutionary rhetoric instead of actually participating in revolutionary activities. Another issue I have comes from the fact that it is so damn sad…Is anybody happy anymore. Every time I hear some spoken word it’s has all of the gleeful charm of a wrist-cutting emo show. I’ve always thought about becoming a legitimate spoken word artist and write about my loving family and happiness towards life. My career, of course, would be short lived because I don’t have any issues with my dad (we golf together now and he even hugs me *pause*), I was never raped or molested by a priest, I find Black Nationalism silly and “black is perfect” ideology to be counterintuitive, I have a relatively concrete political perspective that I couldn’t summarize in 16 bars and finally I just don’t like waving my hands in the air as I stand on the verge of tears…sorry.
One of my favorite poets…Darius Lovehall…is not even real. Yes people, Spoken Word has gotten to the point where I like fictional characters more than the real thing.
But again not all spoken word artists make me shake my head. I like Gil Scott-Heron (cliché) and newer artists like Staceyann Chin (modern cliché) or Saul Williams but they’re real and not about making people go “oooh” and snap their fingers. I like that.
Kimberly Alexander (The Real World Hollywood)
So the focus of this season of the (in)famous MTV “reality” show has been the interesting behavior of Greg Halstead. Known for his arrogant antics and cleverly laid pranks, Greg has become the vilified member of the house. It should be understood that while Greg has done some heinous acts, he has also performed his stunts in a particularly interesting way, generally as a reactionary measure to a previous altercation with one of his house mates. A particular story arc plays out with Greg being asked to clean up the grease in the kitchen. Greg does clean up…with their toothbrushes. For good measure he cleans the bottom of his sandals as well, just to let them know that they are beneath him. A despicable act indeed, but with a very clever idea behind it. However, when house mate Will decides to make one of the most rudimentary retaliatory moves in history by engaging in sexual acts with Greg’s girlfriend, no one seems to care. Furthermore when Will, spews homophobic epithets at Greg and positions them around the death of Greg’s father no one outside of housemate Brianna (voice of reason) seems to care.
An ethnically ambiguous girl? Must have been like winning the racial commentary lottery…so many slurs, so little time for Ms. WASP 2008, Kim Alexander.
However, the most ridiculous and underplayed character in the house would be the Southern Belle, Kim. While I prefer not to simply call people “racist”, Kim clearly has some racial issues. This season finds Kim telling ethnically-ambiguous house mate Brianna, “Let’s not get ghetto”, several times during an altercation outside of the house. She furthermore goes on to attack Brianna, for her former occupation of stripping, in one of the most disgusting displays of condescension and judgment. She then goes on to say, “I don’t care if you’re from the most inner-city…Blackville, you don’t act like that.” I don’t think that Kim has any prejudice in her heart…yeah and I saw David Duke at Roscoe’s House of Chicken ‘n’ Waffles last week.
PETA
The People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals. You know I don’t think that animal cruelty is right. You shouldn’t kick a dog. That’s bad. But I’ll be damned if you tell me not to eat cow. Maybe they shouldn’t treat the animals like crap in a slaughterhouse. Point. Or maybe cows should step their game up. All I’m saying is PETA is fighting for these lame animals who need to step it up on an evolutionary level. We as people are higher on the food chain so we have the right to eat them. Again I don’t advocate beating animals, but I’m no vegan. While I kid, PETA, in a facetious way (slightly); I do have a serious issue. My problem is…your entire mission. Prime example: The Michael Vick case.
Mos Def: Smarter than everyone in PETA, even while high…fantastic.
Now my problem is the fact that you all are some of the most dedicated, hard working, tireless individuals in the world and yet you choose to fight for animals. Do you realize how stupid that sounds? Hey, PETA I know that animals are getting killed, but so are people…in Iraq…a lot of people. You all talk about ethics and yet, you disregard the atrocities of the wars that have killed countless lives. Am I putting a human life above an animals…YES! That is the problem with you PETA people. You have this ridiculous and slightly questionable/illegal affinity for animals that consider them on the level of humanity. That is stupid and you know it. So, unless you plan to procreate with the dog you saved from that abusive animal shelter, I suggest you get a cause that involves the betterment of people and not beings who aren’t even smart enough to realize that they’re chasing their own tail.
The Notorious G.O.D.

Sorry Google didn’t have a real picture of God…you know if you heard the voice of God, it would sound just like Morgan Freeman though.
Dear Lord,
I understand that you are the Supreme Being and love all of your creations…but come on. The fact that this list exists is on your shoulders. So you’re telling me that you can burn bushes and talk to animals and do all kind of really cool baller stuff…and yet you can’t shut Hillary up. You can lead Moses and the Israelites out of bondage and yet you can’t deliver me from the silliness of white people; although the Obama supporters sometimes have this strange locust feel to them. All I’m saying is, that if I was the “all-knowing” I would realize how silly my people are and throw down some plagues or something. Get Old Testament on these characters and just start start smiting people again. This is no disrespect, God, because you know I’m down with you (BFFs) but you get a couple of head shakes for allowing these things to pass. You speak it and it shall be done, huh? All I’m asking for is a bit of help down here. I mean you made Prince…and iTunes and my parents…and Kim from the Real World? Well you’re the omniscient one not me. So how about you tell me which one doesn’t fit…Kim…yeah that’s what I thought. I’m just saying God…I’m just saying…
Well lot’s of love and ummmm…God Bless? I’ll see you later (or maybe you”ll see me Mr. Omnipresent, jk jk lol) But we’ll def talk later. In your name I pray. Amen.
22 Comments so far
Leave a comment
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <pre> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

“…Hitherto philosophers have had the solution of all riddles lying in their writing-desks, and the stupid, exoteric world had only to open its mouth for the roast pigeons of absolute knowledge to fly into it. Now philosophy has become mundane, and the most striking proof of this is that philosophical consciousness itself has been drawn into the torment of the struggle, not only externally but also internally. But, if constructing the future and settling everything for all times are not our affair, it is all the more clear what we have to accomplish at present: I am referring to ruthless criticism of all that exists, ruthless both in the sense of not being afraid of the results it arrives at and in the sense of being just as little afraid of conflict with the powers that be.”
-Marx, 1843
Comment by Eric June 9, 2008 @ 11:50 pmThat just about sums up my entire existence…for that you have earned yourself a shout-out in my first book entitled, “Things I Don’t Like and With Good Reason: The Hater/Critic Ambiguity”…thank you sir.
Comment by Paul June 10, 2008 @ 9:46 amI can agree with the statement with about spoken word being overly sad and depressing.
I think it is wrong to “assume” that spoken word artist aren’t about what the say they are about. Yes, they are plenty faking but do we really know who is and who isn’t?
I have never done research on all the spoken word artist that I hear to see if they are “real”. How do we know that folks part taking in some revolutionary movement? Out of sight doesn’t mean not in action.
Just because their poetry might be bad, doesn’t mean they are not doing something good in their community.
Good post, do you!
Comment by DLUX: THE LIGHT June 10, 2008 @ 4:30 pmOne,
Desmond
DLUX: THE LIGHT
The Spoken Word Hip Hop Poet
http://www.dluxthelight.com
No, I agree 100%. However, speaking with fellow blogger and talented Spoken Word artist Josh he too has noted a trend in the lackluster performance of Spoken Word. Now I haven’t done research either but considering his position I believe he has seen a bit more than I have. Furthermore, I believe that I did note that not all Spoken Word poets were bad or that not all of them were progressive in speech only. Assuming that I would make such a grand and sweeping judgment upon all groups pointed out in the post is a fallacy; one that I did attempt to convey and my apologies for that. With that said, while I facetiously refer to “Darius Lovehall” as one of my favorite poets, I also noted Staceyann Chin, outspoken LGBT activist as well as Saul Williams whose decision to sidestep major music industry outlets with his 2007 release of “The Inevitable Rise and Liberation of NiggyTardust!” was a great attack on the corrupt and exploitative nature of musical conglomerates. In other words, I believe that we are on the exact same page.
Comment by Paul June 10, 2008 @ 4:43 pmI was also called “Obama” for about the 3rd or 4th time today by an unnamed white man…just about a minute ago. This is my life people. Understand my bitterness.
Comment by Paul June 10, 2008 @ 4:45 pm“Sorry Google didn’t have a real picture of God…you know if you heard the voice of God, it would sound just like Morgan Freeman though.”
we’re working on it…
Comment by thelonius June 11, 2008 @ 12:15 amThanks for the response. We are on the same page. I can agree that there is ALOT OF SUB PAR SPOKEN WORD being done. I just encourage people to do the research study the craft and become better at the art form. It seems you are fan of the “genre,” so I would hope you want to see the caliber improve.
But I shake my head at suto self righteous, suto political, and the love jones love poems I hear on the daily basis.
One,
DLUX: THE LIGHT
Comment by DLUX: THE LIGHT June 11, 2008 @ 2:29 amThe Spoken Word Hip Hop Poet
http://www.dluxthelight.com
souljah boy is cakin, dont hate
Comment by kinggeedorah June 14, 2008 @ 11:18 pmChange means going a different route from George Bush’s politics. Seeing that his approval rating is the worst in US history, as a potential candidate I think it’s extremely smart for somebody like Obama to play off the word change and use it to his advantage. Just because people vote for Obama because of this “Change” theme, doesn’t mean they don’t know politics. They know politics enough to know that they don’t want the same George Bush politics that got us into the mess that we’re in now. McCain represents Bush in so many ways and Changing from a president with the lowest approval rating in history is a great thing in my book.
Comment by Perk June 20, 2008 @ 8:54 pmYou are right just because people vote for Obama because of his “Change” theme doesn’t mean that they don’t know his politics…I believe that I said that. My point is that there is a large bloc, who just find him charming and like the fact that he isn’t Bush. This is the very large group of people who ignorantly hate Bush because it’s trendy, not because they really know his politics.
There is the other group of individuals who do know Obama’s politics and understand the fact that he only postures himself as a progressive while his actual political track record places him center-left at best. The fact that these people are voting for the lesser of two evils is disappointing but understood.
However, people wanting Obama because he brings something new to the table, is one of the sillier notions people have used in justifying their support. To say that, because he is not caught up in the “Washington Politics” like his opponents does not make him better. If people really listened to what he was saying they would here Obama arguing that he is better for the job because he is not George Bush. Well, in that case I think I have a claim at the White House too…as well as almost everyone else in the country considering we would most likely all beat his approval ratings.
I mean sure Obama may be better than Bush…debatable and ultimately inconclusive at best…the point is just because a D is better than an F doesn’t mean we should say ok then, that’s my goal…get that D because it’s not a failure. When we work within a two party system, both of which are closer on the political spectrum than the news tells us, then we basically give ourselves two lackluster options.
Comment by Paul June 21, 2008 @ 2:36 amI don’t necessarily think it’s fair to call him a “lackluster” option when we haven’t given him a chance. Mr. Bush has had 8 years of experience….and I’m pretty dang well sure that we can all call his performance “lackluster.” I’m not really sure it matters why people vote for Mr. Obama, the point is that he’s DIFFERENT from Mr. Bush. The point that you say we’re all “different”, isn’t a good one because we haven’t made it to the White House like Mr. Obama. If you make it there my man, I’ll shut up and you already know I’ll give you my vote…until then…it goes to Mr. Obama as “different” as his politics may seem….or as similar as they seem in your opinion. But, consequently the fact of the matter is that he gives tax breaks to the poorest Americans instead of the wealthiest and his “change” gives us a chance to pursue a different route, IDK who the candidate is, if it’s different from Mr. Bush, then as far as I’m concerned we should be willing to give it a chance….
Comment by Perk June 21, 2008 @ 4:32 amFor the record, the difference between a “D” and an “F” can be the difference between getting credit and not getting it in certain Non-Major courses, therefore it’d be saving eeeh “$50 K” per year in GW’S case…..therefore I’d def. take a “D” over an “F” my dude
Comment by Perk June 21, 2008 @ 4:34 am1. I mean I know his politics well enough to know that he probably isn’t going to make the changes that people think that he is…thereby making him lackluster.
2. I never said Bush wasn’t lackluster…but seriously everyone needs to move on Bush it out…he’s not in the race so why are we looking back for comparison.s
3. I’m different from Soulja Boy…that doesn’t make me a good rapper…or even better than him…that argument is completely ungrounded in any substantial political policy comparison.
4. The point is you shouldn’t have to vote for the guy who is like Bush, as you say (McCain) or the guy who isn’t like Bush, as you say (Obama)…because that is a silly reason to vote for anyone…considering it has nothing to do with what they will actually do in office.
5. A “D” is better than an “F”…as my transcript shows…but who really wants the D…like yea I got a “D” in calc…but I would prefer an “A”. I got credit, but law school still says, “Damn homie got a “D”…we’re talking about the difference between 0 and 1…is that reaaally how we want to look at our presidential options.
6. 3rd Party Politics and Grassroots Movements…why are all the biology majors becoming biologists, chemistry majors becoming chemists, and political science majors become…professors…cuz politics has very little to do with changing anything…so they go into academia…write books and work in their organizations and live their lives as socialists.
Ultimately what needs to be understood is that getting to the White House has very little to do in your substantial plan and more to do with how good of a politician you are. I have always said that Obama is one of the best politicians that I have seen in my life. The way he has molded the words “change” and “hope” into an entire movement is tremendous…but does it make him a good president? You’re right we don’t know. But from his politics…yes I do know that he prolly won’t make a good one. Better than Bush?
And as far as taking a “D” over and “F”…well clearly I would take the “D”…as I have before…but the point is we should shoot for an A…which I believe I noted in saying that it shouldn’t be our goal.
And again, this idea that different is better is not grounded. I can say from a concrete mathematical
Comment by Paul June 21, 2008 @ 5:11 pmWho in the world are any of us to say that one is a “D” compared to an “F”. I mean you have the time to read every single little small detail of his politics…Congrats….But in no way does that mean you can predict how well of a candidate he’s going to me
All of us aren’t that interested in politics…if we were, we’d all be poli sci majors…I just feel like u think that just because you “know” his politics “Inside and out” because you have the time to read up on all of his politics, that you can say how great of a president he’s going to be. Hell, with the path I’m going on I’m going to be VP of HR one day, but does my previous job experience completely predict how great of an HR employee I’m going to be one day? The answer is HELL NO. My boss did Psych, worked in Customer service, and is my “Boss” at Boeing which is a pretty big deal. But, his path was not nearly as good as mine and since I’m on the “Right path” I’m going to run stuff in HR one day….
In a sense, how absurd is that. You have no clue how great he’s going to be, just like I have no clue how great I’m going to be. As far as the Souja Boy argument, as far as I’m concerned he’s doing his thing because he’s getting paid and the masses love him…and isn’t that what it’s all about……
Because according to you, one rapper isn’t better than the next because of their lyrics because they all see “Success” ass appealing to the masses which as far as I’m concerned Souja Boy certainly has done…
Lastly, as far as I was concerned, “Concrete mathematical” is a formula, along with my HR example, there’s no formula for anything in the world, come on now you should know that better than any of us since your in such a “subjective” field such as Poli Sci…
Don’t sit around and tell me how “successful” obama is going to be and how he’s going to be a “D” candidate compared to an “F” one, there’s no basis behind it and i truly feel like your “Hating” on him because you don’t think that he can bring about the “Change” that he talks about….
Give people a chance
Comment by Perk June 21, 2008 @ 10:01 pm1. This is waaaaay to serious.
2. I’m not really worried about people knowing his politics…at all. People have more important things to worry about…I don’t really get invested in the whole “political” thing anymore because I don’t think actual changes come from the top down. So who cares if people know his politics. I was not implying that because of his past he would suck…my point is by looking at his past record we can see what type of candidate he will be…one that is more towards the center…a lot closer to Bush than we think. Ergo if “Bush sucks” then I guess Obama will, in theory, not be much better. As a matter of fact their exit strategies were very very similar.
3. My comments cut off so the whole “mathematical” thing is null in void…neither of know what was said there…however it is political “science”…so there aren’t technically formulas, but calling it subjective is a bit more complicated…
4. If I have no basis for that than saying that he will be better than Bush also has no basis…especially when the ultimate point is well-researched argument that he is “different”
5. If not supporting a candidate for posturing himself as a progressive candidate who is the polar opposite of Bush, despite the fact that his political record proves otherwise, then I guess I’m a hater. See the problem is I critique things…like I see a problem with something and I give substantial evidence to an opinion. I don’t blindly attack things…I research them…I mean if that makes me a hater I can live with that. These things get way to personal like I said Obama was a bad person or something. The idea of not supporting someone is not an attack on the personal it just notes the blatant contradiction is his entire rhetoric.
6. This has absolutely nothing to do with my post whatsoever. I poked fun at the hilarity of the Obama fanclub…I mean if this is “hating” I can only imagine what Eric’s post was…
7. This all goes back to a misreading of my posts, which is usually the case…I guess I’m not as clear as I should be…a prime example goes with the whole Soulja Boy thing where my point was missed…yes you can be better lyrically…I just don’t think the content makes someone better…but it’s pretty easy to judge the way people write their lyrics (vocabulary, analogies, swagger, etc.). With that I can easily say that I would write better rhymes than Soulja Boy…no doubt.
8. lmao…this is way to serious…maybe my next post will be about how much I love something.
Comment by Paul June 21, 2008 @ 11:22 pmI agree with you on some of the points you have made about the Obama followers (myself included in that category) in this post and previous ones. Chances are Obama will not be the savior that we all are hoping for, he won’t reverse discrimination and with the stroke of a wand end all poverty, but how much of that is his fault. Let’s not forget that there are a lot of checks on Presidential power and for good reason, even as President, Obama will have to make his policies and ideas for change appealing to both parties if he hopes to make permanent changes through law. But should we fault him for Congress’ and the Senate’s satisfaction with the current state of our country? People rally behind Obama because he represents change, he himself embodies the hope that every black child in America can believe in (and no I’m not voting for him solely because he’s black). If Obama actually tries to make the policy changes that he says he will and they are shot down, I will not look at his presidency as a failure. Do you really think Ralph Nader, if elected President, would have more success changing the way things are done in Washington than Obama? Seems to me like you hate how much people love Obama(without being able to back it up with facts) but if that’s the case u shouldn’t be hating on Obama, hate on them and solely them.
Finally for the D vs. F example. I believe Obama is an A candidate, lots of others think if Obama’s an A candidate than Nader’s an A++++ candidate, but there’s no room for A+’s in a 4.0 grading scale. It’s not enough to bash all other candidates and place your hope in Nader, who would create our perfect utopian society, without first considering the feasibility of the changes he claims he will make. I am not against Nader or a lot of the things he stands for but at some point we have to mix a little bit of realism to go along with the idealism. I agree most Obama supporters don’t subscribe to that advice, but Nader’s followers hardly do it at all. Is it really realistic for us to pull all our troops out of Iraq in 6 months and for Iraq to have formal elections and be better off than when we went in. I don’t agree with the war any more than Nader does, but it happened, and now we have to come up with the best way to withdraw troops without allowing the country itself to crumble like a circle of toddlers playing Jenga. Is a single payer healthcare system the best way to go? Yes, is it the most feasible, no? Look at Obama’s healthcare policy, a lot of it resonates with Nader’s, he agrees that the current system of maintaining paper records is extremely wasteful. He believes that the cost of meds is way too high and 2 private insurance agencies shouldn’t account for 2/3 of the market. But he knows that you can’t hope to eliminate private insurance agencies all together, all at once. Private insurance agencies employ millions of people, do we really need more unemployed people in this country? Do you really think a law proposal suggesting that would pass? There are too many members of Congress and Senate who have strong ties to insurance and pharmaceudical companies. But if you increase competition and disband monopolies you decrease the insurance agencies’ power, thereby decreasing the hold they have over our politicians, and that my friend, is change we can believe in.
Comment by Ed June 24, 2008 @ 10:29 amI’ll keep this simple…the fact that Obama can’t do any of the things that he is vaguely alluding to in his “hope” and “change” rhetoric because of presidential checks and balances doesn’t negate the fact…that he won’t be doing anything. That is the entire point…which everyone is clearly overlooking. The fact that he postures himself as a progressive means absolutely nothing if he doesn’t get it done…is that an attack on Obama…not necessarily. The problem is everyone thinks he really is progressive…In reality he understands the need to make himself look like he wants to implement change…does that make him a bad person no…but it does make him a good politician who knows how little power he really has…for the 234234908 time change comes from the bottom not the top.
This whole Obama is going to be an A+ candidate is based on absolutely nothing substantive so I have no interest in engaging that…
Before you start riding the Obama bandwagon on healthcare do some research first. Look at the Massachusetts Plan (his plan) and see how well that worked out…the end.
Nobody placed anything in Nader’s hands anyways…if I vote for him it will be because he is the candidate mostly aligned to my political perspective not because he’s feasible or realistic…that’s a pretty weak move in my opinion…vote for who you want not the winning team…smh.
Comment by Paul June 24, 2008 @ 10:42 amListen the post is funny…stop talking about Obama’s politics on this post…this has nothing to do with him…for real political banter go hit up Eric’s post on him…now if anyone has something to say actually regarding the post please comment accordingly…thanks a bunch.
Comment by The Administration June 24, 2008 @ 10:45 amSo when people disagree with one of your posts, they should just keep quiet about it?
Comment by Anonymous June 24, 2008 @ 8:02 pmlmao…no they should come at me directly cuz I just don’t feel like responding to comments that are in no way relevant to my post and/or draw on a minuscule point of contention that takes us down a completely different irrelevant path…hit me up via email or facebook as one reader did…not a problem…we just like to comment back to everyone for good healthy debate but when it’s just off topic it’s just not good for the blog…and makes our job unnecessarily harder…pretty simple.
Comment by Paul June 25, 2008 @ 12:50 amAnd despite my tone…I really have no interest in debating this stuff considering the blatantly obvious sarcasm and humorous tones of my posts…like do you all seriously want to debate with me?…I gave God a “Shaking My Head” award…please don’t take me seriously enough to start an online debate…you all def have more important things to do than engage my self-proclaimed silliness (not sarcastic)…I like to respond but damn…it’s all jokes.
Comment by Paul June 25, 2008 @ 1:20 amYo cuzzin despite all the debatin, good looks on shoutin out to PETA lovers. I think it’s ridic…Though not gna lie, I give myself props for not eating beef or pork anymore ha
Comment by Perk July 3, 2008 @ 9:40 pm